Step 1. “I happened to be born on the landmass Ireland (Primarily occupied by a nation of European [white], mainly Celts). To assume that I am not part of this ancient nation, by noticing my phenotypical differences to the indigenous Europeans who built it, can only be RACIST!”
Step 2. “To not grant special privileges to this black Irishman and to assume him to be exactly the same as all other Irishmen by not noticing his phenotypical differences is RACIST!”
Step 3. “To be “IRISH” is not to be a white European Celt with Irish culture in Ireland. That is RACIST. A black man can be equally Irish, and to assume otherwise is to be RACIST. However, you are not permitted to treat him equally to other Irish people because to do that would be to be “colour blind” and thus RACIST. Since Irish history does not have an equitable distribution of Irishmen who are also “people of colour”, and since Irish culture has such a white bias, we demand the right to change it to include us, even when no factual evidence backs this up. To refuse those demands is to be RACIST!” We'll take your mythology too, but don't you dare touch ours!
Notice what we can learn from the two pictures above. Reality observing liberal idealists like me are forced to recognize (whether or not it was foolish to ever think it possible) that accepting black Africans into Ireland will not lead to black people becoming equally Irish. It will amount to black people coming to Ireland, forcing people to treat them differently (with the "diversity" enforcing heavies), and making demands of the indigenous Irish culture that they both want to be an equal part of and demand special treatment within. Ireland is obviously a standard example for all European and European derived nations. The globalist left demands that a Trojan horse of future ethnic trouble be let into indigenous European nations because they happen to be born on landmasses currently inhabited by these nations. They will claim that to notice that these people cannot be part of these nations because they have obviously different racial, ethnic and genetic heritages is racist to let these people in. However, the globalist left obviously do not believe that race, ethnicity and genetic heritage are not determinants of who a person is, because once these people are in, the globalist left will assert that to believe such things to be irrelevant is racist, and amounts to little more than an effort to deny ones’ “white privilege” as an original member of that nation. The same white privilege that would not have existed if these people were not let in and allowed to be “Irish” or “Swedish” or “German” in the first place.
Indeed, if the globalist lefts’ endgame of treating ones’ genetic heritage as an immutable factor in what a person is and how they should be treated by society was exposed, particularly to European nations, it would be obvious that everyone agrees that a Somali could not become a Swede or an Irishman because it would be a category error. It would be like a dog becoming a horse for being born in a stable. However, the the globalist left hides this actual belief when engineering "diverse" societies, only to enforce it as an obvious fact after ethnically homogenous white nations are forced to become "diverse". This is clear from their rhetoric for bringing in non-European immigrants, and their rhetoric for what must be done once they are in. First, the globalist left forces the indigenous nation to treat racial, ethnic and genetic heritage as a nonentity, a frame of mind with which they clearly do not agree, but deploy as an initial tactic. It is only then that their cult of victimhood can find its fertile soil in another nasty white majority nation oppressing its “people of colour”, and the charges of "racism by colorblindness" come out in their eternal project of using any means necessary to burden ethnic Europeans with the imagined trope of "white privilege". However, if an indigenously European nation does not have sufficient “people of colour” this victimhood would not exist since everyone would be “white” and thus equally “privileged. This is a classic “bait and switch”, which is masterfully executed. I can only imagine it occurs because otherwise “diversity executives” would have no jobs, and globalist/leftwing ideologues in the academy society and politics wouldn’t have the reasons they need to condemn white people for their original sin of “racism”, a charge that is necessary for the economy that they rely on to exist. Either that, or its merely the unplanned product of atrociously poor and lazy thinking among globalist left elites. In either case, this narrative inconsistency is astoundingly destructive, and can destroy the fabric of nations with an efficiency and permanence that would make the conquerors of old blush.
Make no mistake, this gas-lighting inconsistency in globalist mass-immigration/"social justice" rhetoric is about the most pernicious, nation destroying strategy imaginable, and I have already written about why homogenously European places like Poland have a moral obligation to avoid it until, hopefully, this cynical Marxist nightmare is exposed in the academy as the greedy strategy to produce wanton ethnic conflict that it truly is. It engineers pre-requisite conditions, and then stokes, permanent ethnic tensions in once homogenous states. With the inevitable "affirmative action" that accompanies "diversity" these nations all of a sudden have to consider a person's race and ethnicity when choosing business partners, students, or hiring employees, when once they could just look at individual merits in a single race and sometimes single ethnicity environment (as in places like Poland). The indigenous children of these nations will be permanently given guilt complexes by being taught in school curricula and "diversity workshops" that the they are personally responsible for correcting the "white privilege" inherited from their ancestors, while they are told that taking any pride in their ethnic inheritance is racism. They will simultaneously be encouraged to celebrate the mostly inferior accomplishments of their “diverse” classmates’ ancestors, and respect their right to ethnically (and exclusively) identify with their ancestors' histories and accomplishments.
Indigenous children will be taught that their own culture is not "theirs" alone, but belongs to all their "diverse" friends, while they are expected to learn about and "celebrate" (but not culturally appropriate) all cultures from their "diverse" school colleagues who get to freely, and exclusively, associate with their heritages. Eventually, a generation of the indigenous population will find themselves outnumbered by people from all over the third world. This new majority/plurality of people will not become "poles" or "swedes" in any meaningful sense (if it were ever possible). This is because the rhetorical bait and switch demonstrates the globalist left never actually intended integrate into the indigenous nation, or even attempt to, but rather to create a discrete social category, who that same globalist left will be permanently employed in eternally protecting from "oppression", and "structural disadvantage".
This generation children indigenous to their nation will find themselves without a culture of their own (to identify one would be exclusive and racist), and without control of their state now under the control of bloc-voting ethnic "minorities", whose permanent victim status will be permanently entrenched by having become a majority electorate who the “victim/oppressor” status quo benefits. Meanwhile the indigenous national population will become disempowered minorities in a state once coextensive with their nation, permanently "checking" their privilege, and not legally permitted to treat their diverse "new Europeans" as equal members as their nation, but instead as a persecuted class of foreigners who deserve permanent advantages at the expense of the indigenous population, despite also having control over the indigenous culture in which their parents were once kindly taken in as guests.
The indigenous population will lose the right to an ethnic identity, lose control of their history, lose control of their culture, and lose control of a state, whose "social justice" programmes supporting "diversity" "inclusivity" and an awareness of "white privilege" will legally enforce the status quo. The ancient legacy of the indigenous nation will be permanently lost, while commissars of "diversity" "multiculturalism" "inclusivity" etc. ruthlessly enforce speech codes, and "social justice" schemes that disadvantage the indigenous population and eternally serve the "new Europeans" who the globalist left elite overlords not only brought in, but never actually intended to integrate. They will permanently ensure that any effort to treat all citizens the same will be seen as a persecutory refusal by "privileged whites" to admit "minority" victimhood and structural privilege/disadvantage, which those same elites imported to a once equal society along with their "diverse" new Europeans. This will permanently transform a once integrated, race-blind nation, with a sense of common heritage, purpose and destiny into a hyper race aware, and socially disintegrated, police state, forever enforcing "social justice" programmes at the expense of a shrinking indigenous population whose ethnic and cultural heritage will have been permanently replaced by a politically correct and "inclusive" national narrative over which they have no control or opportunity to escape.