- Mainly Swedish woman argue that refugees and migrants need to be let in.
- Mainly Swedish men argue that this will bring uncivilized behaviour and destroy first world Swedish norms. These men are called racist for "painting all migrants with the same brush".
- The Increase of migrants leads to a huge spike in sexual abuse, which is to say, a huge spike in uncivilized behaviour and the destruction of first world Swedish norms.
- Mainly Swedish women (many of whom who would have supported letting in migrants) blame all men for this, failing to observe the statistical over-representation of a certain kind of man who they are responsible for letting in.
Tell me Swedish ladies, why is it ok to argue that, “since mainly men are abusers it is reasonable to stop them from coming to festivals”, but not ok to argue that “since mainly non-Swedish men are abusers it is reasonable to stop them coming to music festivals? Why is the former politically incorrect but the latter tars everyone with the same brush and is thus evil?
How is it right to blame all men for the actions of some, but wrong to say that it is only some men and to statistically point out who they are? You guys are painting more people with the bigger brush than those who use evidence to argue that migrant men are by far the greater risk factor.
How is it more ethical to tar all men with the same brush, rather than restricting that brush to only to a few who are by far more likely to commit the crime in question?
And they call us the bigots.
Leftist reasoning is so indefensible, and so perfectly destructive, that I don't know how else to understand it than as an infection of some kind.
No feedback yet
Form is loading...