The vast majority of the world consists of ethnically defined nations struggling against each other to preserve and advance their poles and cultures. They are interested in making their nations, their “people”, surpass other nations in all respects, ranging from science to technology to geopolitics to economics. They choose what works and discard what does not. Those aspects of what they retain that are not immediately practical are usually long held traditions and/or practices that retain the integrity of their nation in demographic, social and cultural terms. What is it to advance a nation, if one loses the nation one sought to advance in the process?
Meanwhile, the increasingly irrelevant Western world obsesses over its cult of victimhood, and on advancing every group except their own nations. In fact, they are obliged, by their elites, to deny that they have any blood or cultural ties to each other, or that such ties mean anything. Western nations fancy themselves as superior to the rest of the world in handicapping themselves in this way. What they seem incapable of realising is that all this will accomplish is making themselves irrelevant, and possibly cease to exist, while the great struggle between world nations continues without them.
I don’t know if it is more ironic that Western nations think their suicidal altruism somehow makes them “better” than nations that are surpassing and even replacing them in their own states, or that they think theirs is the attitude that thinks “globally”, rather than parochially and nationally, when the world does not think as they do. It is hard to imagine how the Western elites can honestly state that theirs is the “open minded” world-view that seeks to learn from and adapt to other cultures, when they do the precise opposite of other cultures, choosing instead to blindly serve an anti-nationalist, victimhood worshiping ideology that only emerged in the West and only makes sense to Westerners. Yet they do, and emphatically so. To add to the irony, those same Western elites condemn the nationalist rabble among their kin as closed minded, and incapable of thinking globally or understanding other cultures, when their impulse to preserve their people and culture connects them in a more fundamental way to other nations around the world who could not begin to understand what motivates self-hating, guilt-ridden, suicidal Western elites.
Only the most “racist”, “extreme” and “far-right” European would say things assumed to be obvious by the average Japanese, Chinese, or Igbo persons with respect to preserving ethnic and cultural integrity, or acting for ones’ own nation/tribe before others. If you were to ask an Igbo or a Japanese person if they would be comfortable with their nation or tribe being demographically outnumbered by Germans or Swedes, who would then get to define what it means to be “Igbo” or “Japanese”, they would likely place such a question in the same category as asking if water is wet. It is not a question worth answering. Why would anyone simply allow their nation/tribe of Japanese, or Igbos, to get replaced by Germans or Swedes? If that were normal behaviour, why would it only have occurred in the past through conquest? They would likely believe that acting toward preventing such a future is simply a matter of course, not believing there to be any other rational way for a nation to behave. And yet, Western elites require of their lesser brethren to be comfortable with such a future, and even encourage it, under pain of being “racist”.
No feedback yet
Form is loading...