Anyone who has made any credible red-pilled claim concerning the risks of unlimited immigration into the Western world, will inevitably be met with the standard zombie responses, that are so logically suspect as to be meaningless. In short, they could be said to be pure rhetoric without a drop of dialectic. These all orbit around the "well white people conquered, enslaved, replaced other peoples etc. thus it is only right that their nations get flooded with non-Westerners and slowly destroyed".
Rather than spending their lives pointing out the ridiculously obvious double-standards and logical errors and category errors of all the "well white people..." arguments, I think those of us who have noticed how absurd they are need to put our heads together to find out what basic assumptions bely these "arguments", where these assumptions came from in Western history and how these assumptions spread to all European descended people. It is only once we have identified these facts that can begin the process of destroying these ridiculously indefensible rhetorical memes at their source, and finally make meaningful change in preventing the pathological altruism and arrogant guilt of Westerners from permanently destroying all nations of European descent.
To those who may not have a firm grip on what it is I am saying, or why the “well white people…” rhetoric is odd, consider this. What other group of people in human history has thought, almost to a man, “My ancestors were successful conquerors, thus I must make my children minorities in their own nations by outnumbering them with the people my ancestors conquered”.
At the heart of this argument seems to be some kind of particular guilt that only people of European descent harbor, when no one else does. Mongolians don’t try to outnumber their children in their nation with Pakistanis because of the bloody conquest of their ancestors. Zulu’s don’t live in perpetual guilt over not only conquering and exterminating their victims, but leaving nothing of value behind as did Mongolians and Europeans. There is no ocean of academic literature on the consequences of non-European conquests throughout human history, whose role in shaping human history has been present far longer than could be said of European conquest. So why is it that people of European descent, whether in Europe or abroad, are racked with this guilt?
It is imperative that this generation of academics, and non academic researchers must dedicate themselves to this question, answer it, and change the mindset of Westerners. If they fail to do this, I doubt Western civilization and its peoples will survive the next 100-200 years. Chief among the questions that need to be answered are:
Where did this guilt complex come from, and why do only people of European descent have it?
Why does no one recognize that when your group is the only one, among many other groups of conquerors, to take this line that it will not end in them getting conquered?
How can this pathological guilt complex be reversed before the short sightedness of baby boomers permanently remove European peoples from the world?
No feedback yet
Form is loading...